R v Floyd Hall and others (EVIDENCE) (CR 37 of 2012, CR 38 of 2012, 40 of 2012, 44 of 2012) [2021] TCASC 19 (23 August 2021) (CR 37 of 2012; CR 38 of 2012; CR 40 of 2012; CR 44 of 2012) [2021] TCASC 27 (23 August 2021)
R v Floyd Hall and others (EVIDENCE) (CR 37 of 2012, CR 38 of 2012, 40 of 2012, 44 of 2012) [2021] TCASC 19 (23 August 2021) (CR 37 of 2012; CR 38 of 2012; CR 40 of 2012; CR 44 of 2012) [2021] TCASC 27 (23 August 2021)
CR 37 of 2012
;
CR 38 of 2012
;
CR 40 of 2012
;
CR 44 of 2012
Attorneys
Alair Shepherd QC,
Andrew Mitchell QC , Quinn Hawkins , Katherine Duncan,
Ari Comert,
Finbar Grant,
Jahmal Misick,
James Shepherd,
Kishanta Hall-Comert,
Richard Bendall,
Judges
Agyemang, CJ
Judgment date
23 August 2021
Language
English
Type
Judgment
Flynote
Civil Procedure
Case summary
Paragraph 20 of Arthur Robinson’s witness statement is partially admitted. The names or any description that may otherwise identify any of the defendants who are not the intended persons against whom the evidence is adduced, shall be redacted (paras 24-25).
The evidence in paragraph 20 is not being offered in proof of any charge against any alleged co-conspirator and the question of the admissibility of a hearsay statement need not be considered (paras 20-22)
Loading PDF...
This document is 544.4 KB. Do you want to load it?