The Court made an unless order against the 2nd Defendant. The 2nd Defendant was right as to the non-applicability of Order 18, rule 19. It is a rule that addresses the pleadings themselves and not the conduct of the parties, or non-compliance with directions. Turning to Order 24, there was non-compliance with the Directions Order. However, the Directions Order was not a peremptory order. In the Court's view it would be a very extreme case where a defence will be struck out for failure to comply with a non-peremptory order. In the circumstances of this case, given the relatively short period of delay and the fact that a fair trial was still possible, the Court was not minded to make an immediate strike out order. In the circumstances, the appropriate order was an unless order; for the 2nd Defendant’s defence to be struck out unless the 2nd Defendant complies with the Directions Order.
Loading PDF...
This document is 615.7 KB. Do you want to load it?