The notice of motion was dismissed. The Court found that these proceedings sought an order to quash the Minister’s refusal decisions, and those decisions could not be rendered irrational or illegal by his subsequent actions, even if those actions are themselves irrational or illegal. On any view of the matter, the Minister’s refusal decisions are the subject of pending appeals before the Governor. In those circumstances, any possibly viable judicial review challenge must relate to His Excellency’s decisions on those appeals or his failure to make a decision.
Loading PDF...
This document is 808.4 KB. Do you want to load it?