Judgments

784 judgments

All courts

Explore judgments from all courts. Explore all courts →

Recent judgments

Leave to appeal granted on whether dishonest-assistance claim is time-barred and arises from substantially same facts as original claim.
Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings – Order 20 r.5(1),(2),(5) – adding new cause of action – requirement that new cause arise out of same or substantially same facts – limitation periods – Trusts Act s69(1),(2) and s70 (constructive trusts) – whether dishonest assister is a 'trustee' for limitation purposes – leave to appeal standard (real prospect of success).
14 January 2026
An uncorroborated nickname-based dying declaration and unchallenged alibi leave the applicant with no case to answer.
Criminal law – murder – no case to answer – Galbraith test – identification by nickname/dying declaration – hearsay weight – requirement for corroboration – unchallenged alibi.
12 January 2026
Plaintiffs failed to prove a 1968 partnership; claim dismissed and costs awarded.
Partnership law – existence of partnership – requirement of business carried on by two or more persons with a view to profit – dormant partners recognised but must be proven – insufficiency of isolated payments and late hearsay evidence to establish partnership – Crown land cannot be acquired by prescription.
8 January 2026
Court imposed compensation, fine and anger‑management program, departing from guidelines instead of full 12‑year custodial term.
Criminal law – Offences against the person – Wounding / grievous bodily harm with intent – Sentencing: harm categorisation, high culpability, starting point and range under guidelines – mitigation (no previous convictions) – refusal of guilty-plea discount – departure from guidelines in interest of justice – compensation and fine as alternatives to custody – rehabilitation order (anger-management).
16 December 2025
Court granted a protective 12‑month extension of a writ where service was disputed, exercising inherent jurisdiction to prevent injustice.
Civil procedure – extension of writ validity – protective extensions where service is disputed – inherent jurisdiction to prevent injustice – Order 6 r.8 principles (Kleinwort Benson) – balance of prejudice – technical irregularity not automatically fatal.
9 December 2025
The applicant’s claim was struck out as an impermissible relitigation barred by res judicata and privity.
Res judicata; abuse of process (Henderson v Henderson); issue estoppel; privity of interest; misfeasance in public office; strike out under Ord. 18 r.19; appropriate remedy (judicial review v damages).
8 December 2025
Whether circumstantial and expert evidence supported conviction and whether judge misdirected on mens rea, late evidence, post‑offence conduct.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Drawing inferences from primary facts; Mens rea – inference of intention to kill from nature of wound and facts; Expert/scientific evidence – role as part of whole-case assessment; Late disclosure/recall of witness statements – admissibility and prejudice; Post‑offence conduct – admissibility, need to balance probative value against prejudicial effect and to consider innocent explanations; Lies as evidence – application of Lucas direction; Application of the Proviso where inadmissible evidence was admitted but verdict inevitable.
5 December 2025
Non-compliance with statutory jury empanelling requirements warranted discharge of the jury and a trial de novo before a judge alone.
Jury empanelling — statutory compliance with geographic composition of jury list — admission by court administration that jurors were summoned only from Grand Turk — presumption of regularity displaced by correspondence — discharge of empanelled jury — trial de novo — judge-alone trial under Criminal Procedure Ordinance s.58.
20 November 2025
A Minister breached fiduciary duty by relying on an expired land valuation; judgment corrected to reflect that finding.
Administrative/fiduciary duty – Ministerial duty when effecting land transfers – obligation to obtain current valuation where prior valuation has expired or where material change may have occurred. Evidence/interpretation – significance of typographical errors in quoted documents and their potential to alter legal conclusions. Remedies – corrigendum to judgment to correct wording and clarify findings.
14 November 2025
A defendant must prove statutory non‑compliance to invalidate a jury panel; mere assertion is insufficient.
Criminal procedure – Jury empanelling – Presumption of regularity in compilation and drawing of jurors – Burden on challenger to prove non‑compliance – Jury Ordinance ss.8–19, 33 – Informality does not invalidate whole panel; specific objections required – Abuse of process for unsubstantiated dilatory applications.
11 November 2025
Registrar grants interim payments under Order 29 after finding plaintiffs likely to obtain substantial damages, apportioning liability between defendants.
Interim payments (Order 29 r.10–11) – personal injury – high civil standard of proof that plaintiff would obtain substantial damages against a particular defendant – evidence required (medical reports, special damages) – multiple defendants and apportionment – non-compliance with procedural directions not per se fatal.
11 November 2025
Plaintiff failed to prove defendant dishonestly assisted in undervalued Crown land transfers; claim dismissed.
• Crown land allocation – Crown Land Policy – CPLs vs freehold transfers – delegated ministerial authority • Fiduciary duty of minister – distinction between disloyalty (breach) and mere incompetence or error • Dishonest assistance (accessory liability) – elements: fiduciary duty and breach, assistance, and dishonesty (objective test) • Evidence – hearsay in civil proceedings admissible under Evidence (Special Provisions) Act; non-compliance affects weight • Valuation and equitable compensation – assessable loss must flow from breach; speculative development valuations not controlling where land undevelopable/nature reserve
10 November 2025
Court declares vending on specified beach areas unlawful but refuses mandamus, allowing restoration if enforcement remains unsatisfactory.
Beach and Coastal Vending Act 2021 — enforcement — vending zones — operation outside permitted zones — discretionary enforcement by Beach Patrol Unit — limits of mandamus where enforcement is ineffective but not wholly refused; public authority resource/ impossibility defenses.
7 November 2025
Refusal to grant residence permit to same‑sex spouse found discriminatory; court ordered permit issued, refusing to amend marriage law.
Constitutional law — discrimination (sexual orientation) — sections 7, 9, 16 — interpretation of “spouse” in Immigration Ordinance to include foreign same‑sex marriages — section 10 as lex specialis on right to marry — remedial powers under section 21(2) — courts may fashion effective relief — costs: appellate review of discretionary costs orders (plainly wrong test).
27 October 2025
Appeal dismissed: strong DNA and circumstantial evidence supported convictions; stays and procedural complaints failed.
Abuse of process – stay applications; Disclosure obligations – materiality and relevance; DNA evidence – admissibility, contradictory reports, and jury directions; Circumstantial evidence and no‑case submissions; Procedural irregularities and material irregularity test; Joint enterprise and good‑character directions.
27 October 2025
Joint custody granted but day‑to‑day care and control awarded to respondent as being in the children’s best interests.
Family law – custody and day‑to‑day care – welfare and best interests under Family Law Act – welfare checklist and children’s wishes Child welfare – evidence from social services, psychological assessments and Magistrate’s findings weighed in custody decision Siblings – principle against separation unless necessary; holistic welfare balancing exercise Joint custody – maintained while day‑to‑day care and control awarded to respondent
6 October 2025
Court ordered defendants to disclose specific witness statements under Ord.24 r.7; no evidence the DPP letter existed.
Civil procedure – discovery – Order 24 r.7 – applicant must show prima facie that specific documents exist, relate to matters in issue, and are in opponent’s possession, custody or power. Legal professional privilege – communications between police and DPP examined; privilege may arise only if relationship tantamount to client-lawyer exists. Court’s inherent jurisdiction – inspection under confidential cover to determine whether r.7 affidavit should be ordered. Specific disclosure ordered for identified witness statements; DPP letter not shown to exist.
25 September 2025
Applicant lawfully placed on Stop List for prolonged immigration breaches; work permit does not override Stop List; review dismissed.
Immigration law – Stop List – statutory power to prohibit entry where person conducted themselves "undesirably" – placing name on Stop List lawful where long-term breach of permits; work permit does not negate Stop List; no general right to prior notice of Stop List placement for persons outside jurisdiction; Governor may direct removal but no evidence of such direction here; refusal to accept renewal and claims for damages not established.
22 September 2025
A strata corporation’s blanket no‑pet by‑law was upheld as valid and not ultra vires, constitutional challenge dismissed.
Strata law – By‑laws – Validity of blanket no‑pet by‑law; ultra vires challenge under section 20 STA; constitutional claim under section 17(1) (peaceful enjoyment of property) dismissed; comparative consideration of Cooper (NSW) but different statutory regimes.
22 September 2025
Court refused to sanction a damages‑based 'no win, no fee' agreement, finding DBAs champertous absent legislation.
Damages‑based agreements (DBAs) – champerty and maintenance – Criminal Law Act ss9–10 preserve public policy against champerty – Regulation 23 Code of Professional Conduct prohibits significant pecuniary interest by counsel – indemnity principle and costs recovery – access to justice does not justify judicial creation of DBAs – legislative reform required.
22 September 2025
The Governor's refusal to grant naturalisation was quashed due to procedural unfairness and unlawful fettering of discretion.
Administrative law – judicial review – procedural fairness – refusal of naturalisation – exercise of statutory discretion – legitimate expectation – reliance on policy guidance – mandatory considerations – British Nationality Act 1981 – residency and immigration breach requirements – separation of discretionary powers – fair notice of reliance on policy – natural justice.
13 August 2025
18 July 2025
11 July 2025
10 July 2025
8 July 2025
25 June 2025
The Court lacked power to void a general election and held single‑ballot electronic voting was substantially compliant, dismissing the petitions.
Constitutional and election law – Jurisdiction of election courts – No power to declare an entire general election void; petitions must relate to particular elections/members. Electoral procedure – Electronic Tabulating System – single ballot format permissible; legacy manual‑ballot colour requirement does not apply. Election petitions – Substantial compliance test (Morgan v Simpson refined) governs validity; administrative errors in statutory forms do not necessarily vitiate an election. Evidence – observer reports as hearsay; viva voce evidence of election officials relevant to assessing voter confusion.
6 June 2025
5 June 2025
5 June 2025
5 June 2025